Sudanese Delegation in U.S. to Strengthen Ties and End Conflict

Sudanese Delegation Engages in Diplomatic Talks in Washington

A Sudanese delegation, led by Foreign Minister Mohieldin Salem and including military officials, arrived in Washington on Friday and immediately began discussions with U.S. officials regarding the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The visit comes amid growing international attention on the war that has devastated the country for months.

On Thursday, Sudan’s Sovereignty Council denied any direct or indirect negotiations with the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in the United States. However, this statement came as reports indicated that indirect talks had already begun in Washington between the warring factions. The Sudanese government's official stance remains firm, but there are indications of a more complex diplomatic landscape unfolding behind the scenes.

The Sudanese Foreign Ministry released a statement on Friday, confirming that Foreign Minister Mohi El-Din Salem is visiting Washington at the invitation of the U.S. government. The purpose of the visit, according to the ministry, is to enhance bilateral relations and cooperation. It also aims to advance relations between Khartoum and Washington and continue dialogue on issues of common interest, including supporting peace in Sudan.

In addition to diplomatic efforts, the visit seeks to bolster economic and humanitarian cooperation and discuss opportunities to rebuild the relationship on foundations of mutual respect and shared interests. This highlights the importance of the U.S.-Sudan relationship in addressing both regional and global challenges.

Key Members of the Delegation

According to diplomatic sources, the delegation includes Foreign Minister Salem, Director of Military Intelligence Mohamed Sabir, and Amr Abu Obeida, the special secretary to the head of the Sovereignty Council. Upon arrival, the military attaché at the Sudanese embassy in Washington joined the group, signaling the significance of the mission.

The Sudanese delegation has completed a first round of talks with U.S. State Department representatives. These discussions focused on the army’s vision for ending the war. Additionally, proposals from the Quartet—comprising the U.S., Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt—were discussed. The Quartet’s plan includes a humanitarian truce and a three-month ceasefire.

Despite the Sovereignty Council’s denial, political parties aligned with civilian forces have reported that negotiations to end the war are making tangible progress. This suggests that while official statements may not reflect the full picture, real efforts are being made to find a resolution.

Criticism and Concerns from RSF Advisor

Meanwhile, an advisor to the RSF commander, Al-Basha Tabiq, expressed concerns about the Sovereignty Council’s denial of a “military delegation” in preparatory consultations. He stated that the denial “is not just contradictory but reflects a dangerous reality.”

Tabiq added, “This reflects the multiplicity of decision-making centres within the military establishment and attempts by the leadership of the Islamic Movement to buy more time.” He continued, “(General) Burhan is using subterfuge to cover up preparations and training that will enable him to continue the war.”

Analyst’s Perspective

Sudanese journalist and analyst Diaa al-Din Bilal criticized the Sovereignty Council’s statement denying the talks, saying the denial “should have been more detailed and specific” given the widespread circulation of the news. He clarified that the ongoing talks in Washington do involve “addressing the issue of the war and a proposed American plan.”

Bilal reiterated the government’s firm position of refusing to deal with the “Quartet” as long as the UAE is part of it, accusing the country of being a “participant, financier, and supporter of this aggression.” He added, “If there is to be any dealing with the UAE, it will be as an enemy, not a mediator.”

Conclusion

As the situation in Sudan continues to evolve, the role of international actors, particularly the United States, becomes increasingly critical. The ongoing diplomatic engagement in Washington underscores the complexity of the conflict and the need for a comprehensive approach to achieving lasting peace. With multiple stakeholders involved, the path forward remains uncertain, but the conversations taking place in Washington may offer a glimmer of hope for a resolution.